Just some stats for future reference.
I did the Warrington half marathon today. I didn’t think I was going to be able to, but managed to get a shift swap at work.
It was a good run for me. I managed to batter my previous personal best (from 2012 when I was a young and vigorous slip of a 46 year old lad) by 3 minutes 24 seconds. I was a bit disappointed with the overall time of 1.36:17, I wanted to be a lot closer to 1.30, but hills. And wind. And other excuses.
I’ve got the Manc half next month, so hopefully get within spitting distance of 1.30 then.
The stats, subject to change when the final results and proper breakdown get posted are:
I was 1.36:17
5,295 people entered the half (I don’t know how many were no-shows/ DNF’s yet.)
246th in the men’s race, (only 31 women beat me! That’s quite impressive for me.)
25th in my age group.
The age group stat is meaningless until I know how many were in that category, but 277th out of 5,295 puts me in the the top 5.23% for the overall race.
Just looked at my last Warrington half stats in 2016.
65th in age group.
Wow. That’s way more encouraging.
Right, I’ll confirm when the official results are up, but just on the stats I’ve got that’s not bad.
Then Lettie, a niece-in-law, said her chap did it in 1.15.
I thought it was a wind-up. He’s a noob, only been running for about a year, after knee surgery. No way.
She seemed serious. As was Wendy. I looked it up, that would be a 5.45 m/m pace. Nah, not even. They looked it up on the results, there he was 1.15. I was stunned, full of admiration, but mainly gutted. In the end Lettie got to doubting herself so texted Mark, her chap.
He’d ran the 10K.
But, for some actual perspective, today somebody ran a 2.01 in the Berlin marathon. A full marathon at 4.38 m/m pace.
I hear competitive knitting is the future.